Most fraud RFPs fail before they're ever issued...

Because teams rush to evaluate vendors before aligning on what actually protects revenue, customers, and growth. Choosing a fraud partner isn’t a technology decision. It’s a business strategy, and the wrong questions lead to the wrong outcomes.

Download the guide

Fill out the form to request a demo.

What You’ll Learn:

How to define fraud success in revenue terms, not just chargebacks

Where checkout-only fraud strategies quietly break down

The hidden cost of "black box" vendors that won't show you why they're declining good customers.

The six questions that should shape your RFP before vendors ever enter the room

United Airlines improved fraud detection accuracy, increasing chargeback wins by

40%+

(source: Accertify case study)

Reduced their loss from fraud by

62%

(source: Accertify case study)

Reduced their loss from fraud by

75%

(source: Accertify case study)

The Hidden Flaw in Most Fraud RFPs

Most RFPs still treat fraud as a narrow, checkout-only problem.

But as businesses grow, fraud becomes more complex spanning account creation, checkout, post-purchase behavior, and chargebacks.

Neglecting this lifecycle coverage results in lost revenue, operational friction, and a fraud strategy that works against growth instead of enabling it.

The strongest fraud programs start with six strategic questions that align incentives, clarify trade-offs, and help define what success means.

Form background

Download the guide:

6 Questions to Ask Before Issuing a Fraud RFP →

6 Questions to Ask Before Issuing a Fraud RFP

Download this guide if…

  • You’re drafting an RFP and realize you don’t know what “good” actually looks like.
  • Your current fraud partner declines too many legitimate customers and you can’t figure out why.
  • Leadership wants lower fraud losses AND higher approval rates (and you need to deliver both).
  • You suspect your fraud strategy is missing blind spots but can’t articulate where.